## Shake 3a: Births on reduced digit 1 is the most frequently since 1 takes the lead and holds it - implying a trait or what we can call a stringotype*.

From Shake 2 we have that numbers or strings forms matter. From Shake 1 we have that most births are on number 1.

That obviously tells us that most human matter is clustered to 1 and holds the lead.

If we on this page assume Shake 2 is true, string theory solves the Hierarchy problem. Then there will be a connection all the way from the biggest scale of matter to the smallest scale of strings. In between we have individuals.

Can individuals be divided into strings? Constrains on energy and measurements makes it impossible to split quarks down to the assumed fundamental level of strings. Hence string theory lacks experiments. Whilst assuming Shake 2 is true, the connection between scales makes individes possible experiments. The chart below shows a segment of prominent Al Qaida leaders and convicted members where one could assume some homogenity. Reduced birthday number 1 is statistical significant. The chart can be seen as a scatter plot of strings.

In-sample significance for reduced birthday 1 is remarkable strong (Z=3,4). After performing the chart, four more Al Qaida leaders are known from media - all with reduced birthday 1, serving as an out-of-sample test:

Mokhtar Belmokhtar, In Amenas terror attack, born 1 June 1972

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, IS-leader, born 28 July 1971

Abdul Majeed al-Zindani, founder and head of the Iman University in Yemen, born 1 January 1942

Adam Yahiye Gadahn, Al Qaida leader, interpreter and PR, born 1 September 1978

* Based on both string theory and the algebra`s similarity with a Semi-Thue-System and stringology.

If a way to the better there be,

it lies in taking a full look at the worst.

Thomas Hardy

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From circle group root values 1-9 via Benford`s Law with resonate fractionalization

- 3a) does society and interpersonal contact propagate quasitparticle phonon influencing cerebral correlates in human beings?

I find this article interesting regarding quasiparticle and Benford`s Law:

Observation of Majorana quantum critical behaviour in a resonant level coupled to a dissipative environment

I. V. Borzenets, U. C. Coskun, H. T. Mebrahtu, Yu. V. Bomze, A. I. Smirnov, and G. Finkelstein

A quantum phase transition is an abrupt change between two distinct ground states of a many-body system, driven by an external parameter. In the vicinity of the quantum critical point (QCP) where the transition occurs, a new phase may emerge that is determined by quantum fluctuations and is very different from either phase. In particular, a conducting system may exhibit non-Fermi-liquid behaviour.

Although this scenario is well established theoretically, controllable experimental realizations are rare. Here, we experimentally investigate the nature of the QCP in a simple nanoscale system—a spin-polarized resonant level coupled to dissipative contacts.

We fine-tune the system to the QCP, realized exactly on-resonance and when the coupling between the level and the two contacts is symmetric. Several anomalous transport scaling laws are demonstrated, including a striking non-Fermi-liquid scattering rate at the QCP, indicating fractionalization of the resonant level into two Majorana quasiparticles.

- 3b) are big population clocks influencing us more than quality "9-5"?

In Space, Time and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought, prof. Stanislas Dehaene and dr. Elizabeth Brannon describes population clocks within our brain:

The critical challenge to any population clock model is how a dynamic population of active neurons would be genereated. In principle, any recurrent neural network can produce time-varying activity, which can be thought of as a neural trajectory.

For sure, the neural activity has to start, progress and stop. The process or firing is measured by numbers 0-9 (and most probably follows Benford`s Law as gene expression and protein folding does). Hence, a model according to plain numbers can be generated. Time-varying or fractionalized activity can be thought of as a neural trajectory by reducing measurements to single digits 1-9. My hypothese is that these root values works as primary responses and defines the shape of the trajectory. A model like this - with an algebraic foundation, will be more than "fitting the data".

The second challenge to population clock models is that the trajectory must be able to be elicited in a robust and reproducible manner.

A circle-group based model with root values (primary responses) 1-9 defining the neural trajectory, should be easily replicable and robust. The model is applied on gene expression and protein folding in my book Karikaturer, with primary responses suggested as significant outliers among digits 1-9 (also adjusted for Benford`s Law).

Population clocks fits within our brain. How surprised should we be if it also fits between brains? For the example at the top, we should expect people born on the 1st, 10th, 19th and 28th to be - single minded.

What about Dolly Parton? She is born 19 January 1946.

The harmony of the universe knows only one musical form - the legato;

while the symphony of number knows only its opposite - the staccato.

Tobias Dantzig

....speed helps to reconcile staccato with legato. But be aware of wearing out the matter. (Play it again, Dolly!)

Karikaturer shows that extraordinary achievements by test persons are significantly attached to the boson-like numbers 3,6,9. These numbers also happens to be the rdecuced number of the solution to all ancient mathematical problems.

The book also shows how certain numbers in Plimpton 322 can have been used for sieveing out the preferred lenghts of triangles. Baselines are always a trigonal number (see Shake 2 for definition). The same root values - or stringotypes as the anomaly suggests specific qualities to the numbers, appears in Wallis sieve. Again,

professor Richard Taylor, winner of Breakthrough Prize in Mathematics, born 19 May 1962

asks if the Babylonians were using trial and error or if they knew an algorithm. The anomaly presented on this site opens up for the latter. Are we not tired of speculations about the slope of the Great Pyramide? Yes we are, but what about the reduced digit sum?

Does this remind you of the "shame-on-you word" numerology? You can hear what

Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde, born 1 January 1956

thinks about the "shame-on-you word" numerology here:

Lagarde is now negotiating debt refinancing with

Prime minister of Greece, Alexis Tsipris, born 28 July 1974.

Both are born on day-numbers with reduced digit 1 which takes the lead. Cherry picking? Probably not if an empirical test shows statistical significance. But for the most, we consider mapping of events with numbers as what skeptics call numerology or mumbo jumbo. The reason is that it is very easy to map uncritically (trial without checking for failure), or if done critically - there are not many enough world wars or observations to consider statistical significance.

Nevertheless, numerology shouldn't be brushed off

without a thorough examination of its underlying theory.

Robert Todd Carroll

## Shake 3b: Eurovision Song Contest demanding self-reliance and stage performance is not suprising. But leader 1 and artist 3 being the most significant frequent number in their birthdays and names is suprising. => Confirming Shake 1 and 3a

After reading the skeptics definition of numerology just above; let us consider the charts below of birthday and name value frequencies for Eurovision Song Contest 2016 and 2015. Reduced birthday number 1 is statistically significant the most frequent for the finalists in 2016 and ranks the highest in 2015 (earlier years are not checked). The so-called destiny or fate number in numerology - which is the contracted number of the birth date; ranks the highest for number 3 in both years. In numerology; 1 and 3 are typical interpreted as leader and artist (see Shake 6 or google).

Considering the tables; one can see that a finalist either has 1 and 3 in their birth date or in their names. The statistical significance ( Z > 2) points to the number traits, or stringotypes, 1 and 3s contribution to the finalists.

Eurovision Song Contest is a highly specialized contest with national contests and international semifinals prior to the final. The charts hints to Benford`s Law as seen in general for births in Shake 1, but here with natural selection of traits or probably primary repsondants in number 1 and 3 causing deviation from standard Benfordian distribution. This is similar to what is found to be specific stringotypes for the worlds richest, Nobel Prize laureates, terrorists and popes in the book Karikaturer.

The similarity between 2016 and 2015 is strongest for the two most important numerological numbers; the birthday number (what you are at most) and the destiny/fate number (life purpose in a way). However; the weaker significance for 2015 may be due to exclusion of observations for duos and trios, contributive effects of also other numbers and number combinations as well (implying higher degree of randomness/blur) or even changes in the contest to more grandeur, glam and fame.

As shown also in this shake - letters (multinomial nomenclature, also see Shake 5) and numbers seems to matter significantly to real, large scale observations. The reason for this is proposed in Shake 1 & 5 as circadian rythms caused by strong matching between letters, numbers in Base-10 system and nature at all scales.

Numerology is the effect of Benford`s Law and primary respondants (possibly strings in string theory).

It`s all algebra.